Editorial and Corrections Policy
How Salienci researches, reviews, labels and corrects everything published on this website.
Published
Salienci publishes measurement content. That only holds value if the rules behind it are visible, so this page states how content is produced, how claims are labelled, and what happens when we get something wrong. It applies to every public page, including the Salienci Score methodology and the results and benchmark pages.
Who publishes and owns this content?
All content on salienci.ai is published by Salienci.ai as an organisation. Editorial ownership sits with the Salienci Editorial group, which approves every substantive change before it goes live. Where a named individual contributes, they are credited only with their own verified role - we do not attach invented authors, biographies or credentials to any page.
How is content researched and reviewed?
Every substantive page is drafted against the published methodology, reviewed by a second reader for factual accuracy, and checked against what the platform can actually measure. Pages describing measurement are reviewed alongside the current Salienci Score methodology so that public wording and internal definitions do not drift apart.
- Claims are traced to a source before publication.
- Product and methodology descriptions are checked against current delivery.
- Anything that cannot be substantiated is removed or relabelled rather than softened.
How are numbers and examples labelled?
Figures shown in dashboards, score cards and sample visuals are illustrative diagnostic examples unless a source and sample are stated on the page. Aggregated benchmark values are labelled as aggregated diagnostics, never presented as a single client outcome, and never presented as a guaranteed result.
- Illustrative diagnostic example: a representative value used to show format, not an outcome.
- Aggregated benchmark: a value derived from multiple diagnostics, with the basis stated.
- Client outcome: only published with documented provenance and permission.
What sources does Salienci use?
We prefer primary sources: platform documentation, published standards, and our own diagnostic data. External factual claims carry a descriptive link to the source. We do not add outbound links purely to increase citation counts, and we do not cite sources we have not read.
How often is content reviewed?
Pillar and methodology pages are reviewed on a rolling schedule and after any material change to the underlying method. Review dates shown on a page reflect a genuine editorial review or revision. Deployments, styling changes and navigation changes do not update a review date.
How are corrections handled?
When we find or receive a material error, we correct the page and update its review date. Corrections that change the meaning of a claim are noted in the page revision record held in our content system. Minor typographic fixes are made without a dated note.
- Report an error through the contact page, naming the URL and the statement in question.
- We acknowledge reports by email and state whether a change will be made.
- Where a claim cannot be substantiated after review, it is removed.
What Salienci will not publish
We do not publish fabricated reviews, ratings, customer names, awards, certifications or guarantees. We do not promise rankings, AI citations, revenue or recommendation positions. Where evidence is not available, the page says so rather than filling the gap.
Who to contact about published content
Editorial questions, correction requests and source enquiries go to the Salienci Editorial group through the contact page. Include the URL and the exact statement. For questions about how a figure was produced, start with the methodology.
Continue reading
These pages give the next layer of detail behind what you have just read.
Published